<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amateurs vs. Professionals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.backyardstargazer.com/2010/06/06/amateurs-vs-professionals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.backyardstargazer.com/2010/06/06/amateurs-vs-professionals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.backyardstargazer.com/2010/06/06/amateurs-vs-professionals/comment-page-1/#comment-2618</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backyardstargazer.com/?p=103#comment-2618</guid>
		<description>Astronomy is nearly the only area of science where amateurs regularly contribute significantly to the world&#039;s body of knowledge. A friend of mine who is a physics professor has commented that it always amazes him how much money people are willing to spend on the hobby - and compared it to biology - people don&#039;t often drop 10 grand on biology equipment as a hobby, but people regularly spend that much and more for astronomy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also think you&#039;re right about the difference being that the professional astronomers don&#039;t feel threatened buy backyard astronomers and so the relationship between the two is more often cordial. Heck, a few months ago, Sky &amp; Telescope had an article from a researcher asking for help from amateurs because serious amateurs (with 20&quot; scopes) generally had more scope time available to them than he had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astronomy is nearly the only area of science where amateurs regularly contribute significantly to the world&#39;s body of knowledge. A friend of mine who is a physics professor has commented that it always amazes him how much money people are willing to spend on the hobby &#8211; and compared it to biology &#8211; people don&#39;t often drop 10 grand on biology equipment as a hobby, but people regularly spend that much and more for astronomy.</p>
<p>I also think you&#39;re right about the difference being that the professional astronomers don&#39;t feel threatened buy backyard astronomers and so the relationship between the two is more often cordial. Heck, a few months ago, Sky &#038; Telescope had an article from a researcher asking for help from amateurs because serious amateurs (with 20&#8243; scopes) generally had more scope time available to them than he had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

